Human fibroblast and stem cell resource from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network

BACKGROUND: Mutations in amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilin 1 (PSEN1) and presenilin 2 (PSEN2) cause autosomal dominant forms of Alzheimer disease (ADAD). More than 280 pathogenic mutations have been reported in APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2. However, understanding of the basic biological mechanisms that drive the disease are limited. The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) is an international observational study of APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 mutation carriers with the goal of determining the sequence of changes in presymptomatic mutation carriers who are destined to develop Alzheimer disease. RESULTS: We generated a library of 98 dermal fibroblast lines from 42 ADAD families enrolled in DIAN. We have reprogrammed a subset of the DIAN fibroblast lines into patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines. These cells were thoroughly characterized for pluripotency markers. CONCLUSIONS: This library represents a comprehensive resource that can be used for disease modeling and the development of novel therapeutics

BDNF Val66Met moderates memory impairment, hippocampal function and tau in preclinical autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease

The brain-derived neurotrophic factor ( BDNF ) Val66Met polymorphism is implicated in synaptic excitation and neuronal integrity, and has previously been shown to moderate amyloid-β-related memory decline and hippocampal atrophy in preclinical sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. However, the effect of BDNF in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease is unknown. We aimed to determine the effect of BDNF Val66Met on cognitive function, hippocampal function, tau and amyloid-β in preclinical autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease. We explored effects of apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) ε4 on these relationships. The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network conducted clinical, neuropsychological, genetic, biomarker and neuroimaging measures at baseline in 131 mutation non-carriers and 143 preclinical autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease mutation carriers on average 12 years before clinical symptom onset. BDNF genotype data were obtained for mutation carriers (95 Val 66 homozygotes, 48 Met 66 carriers). Among preclinical mutation carriers, Met 66 carriers had worse memory performance, lower hippocampal glucose metabolism and increased levels of cerebrospinal fluid tau and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) than Val 66 homozygotes. Cortical amyloid-β and cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β 42 levels were significantly different from non-carriers but did not differ between preclinical mutation carrier Val 66 homozygotes and Met 66 carriers. There was an effect of APOE on amyloid-β levels, but not cognitive function, glucose metabolism or tau. As in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease, the deleterious effects of amyloid-β on memory, hippocampal function, and tau in preclinical autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease mutation carriers are greater in Met 66 carriers. To date, this is the only genetic factor found to moderate downstream effects of amyloid-β in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease

Serum neurofilament dynamics predicts neurodegeneration and clinical progression in presymptomatic Alzheimer's disease

Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a promising fluid biomarker of disease progression for various cerebral proteopathies. Here we leverage the unique characteristics of the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network and ultrasensitive immunoassay technology to demonstrate that NfL levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (n = 187) and serum (n = 405) are correlated with one another and are elevated at the presymptomatic stages of familial Alzheimer's disease. Longitudinal, within-person analysis of serum NfL dynamics (n = 196) confirmed this elevation and further revealed that the rate of change of serum NfL could discriminate mutation carriers from non-mutation carriers almost a decade earlier than cross-sectional absolute NfL levels (that is, 16.2 versus 6.8 years before the estimated symptom onset). Serum NfL rate of change peaked in participants converting from the presymptomatic to the symptomatic stage and was associated with cortical thinning assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, but less so with amyloid-β deposition or glucose metabolism (assessed by positron emission tomography). Serum NfL was predictive for both the rate of cortical thinning and cognitive changes assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination and Logical Memory test. Thus, NfL dynamics in serum predict disease progression and brain neurodegeneration at the early presymptomatic stages of familial Alzheimer's disease, which supports its potential utility as a clinically useful biomarker

First presentation with neuropsychiatric symptoms in autosomal dominant Alzheimer\u27s disease: The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer\u27s Network Study

Behavioural changes and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) commonly occur in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) but may not be recognised as AD-related when they are the presenting feature. NPS are important as they are associated with greater functional impairment, poorer quality of life, accelerated cognitive decline and worsened caregiver burden.1 Autosomal dominant AD (ADAD), although \u3c 1% of total AD cases, provides a valuable opportunity to study the clinical heterogeneity of AD. The young age at onset reduces the prevalence of age-related comorbid pathologies and the near 100% penetrance of pathogenic mutations reduces the likelihood of misdiagnosis.2 Anxiety and depression commonly occur in ADAD family members, with increased levels of depression having been found among predementia female mutation carriers.3 Subsequent studies, however, have shown that anxiety and/or depression are common regardless of mutation status, occurring in almost one in three at-risk individuals, with one study reporting a higher rate of depression in non-carriers (17%) than asymptomatic carriers (5%).4 5 Despite the high frequency of NPS in ADAD families, relatively little is known about the proportion of ADAD cases who present with predominantly behavioural symptoms. Our aims were to assess the first reported clinical change in symptomatic ADAD, to compare presentations across genotypes, and to compare cognitive performance between behavioural and cognitive-led presentations

Pattern and degree of individual brain atrophy predicts dementia onset in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease

Introduction: Asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease mutation carriers (DIAD-MC) are ideal candidates for preventative treatment trials aimed at delaying or preventing dementia onset. Brain atrophy is an early feature of DIAD-MC and could help predict risk for dementia during trial enrollment. Methods: We created a dementia risk score by entering standardized gray-matter volumes from 231 DIAD-MC into a logistic regression to classify participants with and without dementia. The score's predictive utility was assessed using Cox models and receiver operating curves on a separate group of 65 DIAD-MC followed longitudinally. Results: Our risk score separated asymptomatic versus demented DIAD-MC with 96.4% (standard error = 0.02) and predicted conversion to dementia at next visit (hazard ratio = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI: 1.15, 1.49]) and within 2 years (area under the curve = 90.3%, 95% CI [82.3%–98.2%]) and improved prediction beyond established methods based on familial age of onset. Discussion: Individualized risk scores based on brain atrophy could be useful for establishing enrollment criteria and stratifying DIAD-MC participants for prevention trials.Fil: Keret, Ophir. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Staffaroni, Adam M.. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Ringman, John M.. University of Southern California; Estados UnidosFil: Cobigo, Yann. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Goh, Sheng Yang M.. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Wolf, Amy. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Allen, Isabel Elaine. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Salloway, Stephen. Brown University; Estados UnidosFil: Chhatwal, Jasmeer. Harvard Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Brickman, Adam M.. Columbia University; Estados UnidosFil: Reyes Dumeyer, Dolly. Columbia University; Estados UnidosFil: Bateman, Randal J.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Benzinger, Tammie L.S.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Morris, John C.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Ances, Beau M.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Joseph Mathurin, Nelly. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Perrin, Richard J.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Gordon, Brian A.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Levin, Johannes. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases; Alemania. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; AlemaniaFil: Vöglein, Jonathan. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; Alemania. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases; AlemaniaFil: Jucker, Mathias. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases; Alemania. Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen; AlemaniaFil: la Fougère, Christian. Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen; Alemania. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases; AlemaniaFil: Martins, Ralph N.. Cooperative Research Centres Australia; Australia. University of Western Australia; Australia. Edith Cowan University; Australia. Australian Alzheimer's Research Foundation; Australia. Macquarie University; AustraliaFil: Sohrabi, Hamid R.. University of Western Australia; Australia. Macquarie University; Australia. Australian Alzheimer's Research Foundation; Australia. Cooperative Research Centres Australia; Australia. Edith Cowan University; AustraliaFil: Taddei, Kevin. Australian Alzheimer's Research Foundation; Australia. Edith Cowan University; AustraliaFil: Villemagne, Victor L.. Austin Health; AustraliaFil: Schofield, Peter R.. Neuroscience Research Australia; Australia. Unsw Medicine; AustraliaFil: Brooks, William S.. Neuroscience Research Australia; Australia. Unsw Medicine; AustraliaFil: Fulham, Michael. Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; AustraliaFil: Masters, Colin L.. University of Melbourne; AustraliaFil: Allegri, Ricardo Francisco. Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia. Instituto de Neurociencias - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Neurociencias; Argentin

CSF Tau phosphorylation at Thr205 is associated with loss of white matter integrity in autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease

BACKGROUND: Hyperphosphorylation of tau leads to conformational changes that destabilize microtubules and hinder axonal transport in Alzheimer\u27s disease (AD). However, it remains unknown whether white matter (WM) decline due to AD is associated with specific Tau phosphorylation site(s). METHODS: In autosomal dominant AD (ADAD) mutation carriers (MC) and non-carriers (NC) we compared cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) phosphorylation at tau sites (pT217, pT181, pS202, and pT205) and total tau with WM measures, as derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and cognition. A WM composite metric, derived from a principal component analysis, was used to identify spatial decline seen in ADAD. RESULTS: The WM composite explained over 70% of the variance in MC. WM regions that strongly contributed to the spatial topography were located in callosal and cingulate regions. Loss of integrity within the WM composite was strongly associated with AD progression in MC as defined by the estimated years to onset (EYO) and cognitive decline. A linear regression demonstrated that amyloid, gray matter atrophy and phosphorylation at CSF tau site pT205 each uniquely explained a reduction in the WM composite within MC that was independent of vascular changes (white matter hyperintensities), and age. Hyperphosphorylation of CSF tau at other sites and total tau did not significantly predict WM composite loss. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a site-specific relationship between CSF phosphorylated tau and WM decline within MC. The presence of both amyloid deposition and Tau phosphorylation at pT205 were associated with WM composite loss. These findings highlight a primary AD-specific mechanism for WM dysfunction that is tightly coupled to symptom manifestation and cognitive decline

Comparing cortical signatures of atrophy between late-onset and autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease

Defining a signature of cortical regions of interest preferentially affected by Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology may offer improved sensitivity to early AD compared to hippocampal volume or mesial temporal lobe alone. Since late-onset Alzheimer disease (LOAD) participants tend to have age-related comorbidities, the younger-onset age in autosomal dominant AD (ADAD) may provide a more idealized model of cortical thinning in AD. To test this, the goals of this study were to compare the degree of overlap between the ADAD and LOAD cortical thinning maps and to evaluate the ability of the ADAD cortical signature regions to predict early pathological changes in cognitively normal individuals. We defined and analyzed the LOAD cortical maps of cortical thickness in 588 participants from the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (Knight ADRC) and the ADAD cortical maps in 269 participants from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) observational study. Both cohorts were divided into three groups: cognitively normal controls (nADRC = 381; nDIAN = 145), preclinical (nADRC = 153; nDIAN = 76), and cognitively impaired (nADRC = 54; nDIAN = 48). Both cohorts underwent clinical assessments, 3T MRI, and amyloid PET imaging with either 11C-Pittsburgh compound B or 18F-florbetapir. To generate cortical signature maps of cortical thickness, we performed a vertex-wise analysis between the cognitively normal controls and impaired groups within each cohort using six increasingly conservative statistical thresholds to determine significance. The optimal cortical map among the six statistical thresholds was determined from a receiver operating characteristic analysis testing the performance of each map in discriminating between the cognitively normal controls and preclinical groups. We then performed within-cohort and cross-cohort (e.g. ADAD maps evaluated in the Knight ADRC cohort) analyses to examine the sensitivity of the optimal cortical signature maps to the amyloid levels using only the cognitively normal individuals (cognitively normal controls and preclinical groups) in comparison to hippocampal volume. We found the optimal cortical signature maps were sensitive to early increases in amyloid for the asymptomatic individuals within their respective cohorts and were significant beyond the inclusion of hippocampus volume, but the cortical signature maps performed poorly when analyzing across cohorts. These results suggest the cortical signature maps are a useful MRI biomarker of early AD-related neurodegeneration in preclinical individuals and the pattern of decline differs between LOAD and ADAD.Fil: Dincer, Aylin. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados UnidosFil: Gordon, Brian A.. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados UnidosFil: Hari-Raj, Amrita. Ohio State University; Estados UnidosFil: Keefe, Sarah J.. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados UnidosFil: Flores, Shaney. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados UnidosFil: McKay, Nicole S.. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados UnidosFil: Paulick, Angela M.. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados UnidosFil: Shady Lewis, Kristine E.. University of Kentucky; Estados UnidosFil: Feldman, Rebecca L.. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados UnidosFil: Hornbeck, Russ C.. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados UnidosFil: Allegri, Ricardo Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia; ArgentinaFil: Ances, Beau M.. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados UnidosFil: Berman, Sarah B.. University of Pittsburgh; Estados UnidosFil: Brickman, Adam M.. Columbia University; Estados UnidosFil: Brooks, William S.. Neuroscience Research Australia; Australia. University of New South Wales; AustraliaFil: Cash, David M.. UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology; Reino UnidoFil: Chhatwal, Jasmeer P.. Harvard Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Farlow, Martin R.. Indiana University; Estados UnidosFil: Fougère, Christian la. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases; Alemania. University Hospital of Tübingen; AlemaniaFil: Fox, Nick C.. UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology; Reino UnidoFil: Fulham, Michael J.. Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Australia. University of Sydney; AustraliaFil: Jack, Clifford R.. Mayo Clinic; Estados UnidosFil: Joseph-Mathurin, Nelly. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados UnidosFil: Karch, Celeste M.. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados UnidosFil: Lee, Athene. University Brown; Estados UnidosFil: Levin, Johannes. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases; Alemania. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; Alemania. Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology; AlemaniaFil: Masters, Colin L.. University of Melbourne; AustraliaFil: McDade, Eric M.. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados UnidosFil: Oh, Hwamee. University Brown; Estados UnidosFil: Perrin, Richard J.. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados Unido

Circular RNA detection identifies circPSEN1 alterations in brain specific to autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease

Background: Autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) is caused by pathogenic mutations in APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2, which usually lead to an early age at onset (< 65). Circular RNAs are a family of non-coding RNAs highly expressed in the nervous system and especially in synapses. We aimed to investigate differences in brain gene expression of linear and circular transcripts from the three ADAD genes in controls, sporadic AD, and ADAD. Methods: We obtained and sequenced RNA from brain cortex using standard protocols. Linear counts were obtained using the TOPMed pipeline; circular counts, using python package DCC. After stringent quality control (QC), we obtained the counts for PSEN1, PSEN2 and APP genes. Only circPSEN1 passed QC. We used DESeq2 to compare the counts across groups, correcting for biological and technical variables. Finally, we performed in-silico functional analyses using the Circular RNA interactome website and DIANA mirPath software. Results: Our results show significant differences in gene counts of circPSEN1 in ADAD individuals, when compared to sporadic AD and controls (ADAD = 21, AD = 253, Controls = 23-ADADvsCO: log2FC = 0.794, p = 1.63 × 10-04, ADADvsAD: log2FC = 0.602, p = 8.22 × 10-04). The high gene counts are contributed by two circPSEN1 species (hsa_circ_0008521 and hsa_circ_0003848). No significant differences were observed in linear PSEN1 gene expression between cases and controls, indicating that this finding is specific to the circular forms. In addition, the high circPSEN1 levels do not seem to be specific to PSEN1 mutation carriers; the counts are also elevated in APP and PSEN2 mutation carriers. In-silico functional analyses suggest that circPSEN1 is involved in several pathways such as axon guidance (p = 3.39 × 10-07), hippo signaling pathway (p = 7.38 × 10-07), lysine degradation (p = 2.48 × 10-05) or Wnt signaling pathway (p = 5.58 × 10-04) among other KEGG pathways. Additionally, circPSEN1 counts were able to discriminate ADAD from sporadic AD and controls with an AUC above 0.70. Conclusions: Our findings show the differential expression of circPSEN1 is increased in ADAD. Given the biological function previously ascribed to circular RNAs and the results of our in-silico analyses, we hypothesize that this finding might be related to neuroinflammatory events that lead or that are caused by the accumulation of amyloid-beta